Introduction
Rhetoric. What is rhetoric, and why do we need to know what it is? According to the Merriam-Webster dictionary, rhetoric is the art of speaking or writing effectively (“Definition of RHETORIC”). Everyone uses some form of rhetoric every day. Broadening our understanding of rhetoric helps us become better communicators, therefore enhancing our interactions with people.
“You are constantly sending messages out into the world—whether it be written or verbal messages that you carefully crafted beforehand or unanticipated conversations, offhand remarks, facial expressions, or body language. Even the clothing you wear sends messages to people about who you are and what your interests, occupations, and moods might be” (Miller 215).
Going even further is the challenge of understanding and using rhetoric in digital spaces. To understand rhetoric in online spaces, it is helpful to examine groups of people who collaborate and interact to integrate needs, known as networked communities. Key points to examine to better understand a rhetorical situation are what drives the communication (exigence), the speaker/audience, the message, timing (kairos), and the constraints (anything that could interfere with the audience’s willingness to react positively to the message) (Miller 223-224). Influencing rhetorical situation outcomes are the rhetorical appeals the community uses to persuade their audience, which may include logic (logos), emotion (pathos), and credibility (ethos) (Miller 226-228).
The network community I have chosen for rhetorical analysis is r/blogging on Reddit. The community is self-described as: “A community for bloggers to connect, share ideas, and inspire each other to help their blogging journey” (r/Blogging). The r/blogging community comprises a diverse group of bloggers across platforms, covering a range of subjects and genres and with varying levels of skill and experience.
To conduct a thorough rhetorical analysis of the r/blogging community on Reddit, the community’s demographics, discourse, representative posts, and the extent to which posts have functioned or not will be assessed, along with the frameworks that govern the community.
Community Values, Assumptions, & Purpose
The community values rhetoric that genuinely seeks growth in skill and knowledge. Posts and comments that do not contribute to either of these are often ignored or removed by community moderators. There is an assumption that, if you are in the community, you are there to do exactly what the group self-proclaims as its purpose: to connect, share ideas, and inspire one another in their blogging journeys through discourse. Most people genuinely want to help other bloggers with their insights, and there is substantial participation when people ask good questions and offer useful insight.
The community is generally open to all questions and reflections related to blogging, from technical rhetoric to creative challenges. However, the group appears to have a single underlying source of disagreement in values: the varying uses of AI in blogging. Some users openly discuss using AI to formulate their blog posts; some use AI for broad-spectrum editing and content architecture; and others vehemently oppose the use of AI in every aspect of writing, and even for the human race.
Who is the Community for?
This group is for writers who are practicing craft while navigating technology. A writer who never publishes online, or a tech professional who never writes, may not fit as well into the community as someone who pursues their writing online. Because all bloggers, regardless of genre, must navigate technology in some way, this Reddit group is for any and all genres of blogging.
Community Rhetorical Appeals and Patterns
A pattern in what type of appeals receive the most engagement and what type of engagement they receive. People often have a lot to say when asked how to do something, the speaker leaning into the audience’s pathos and ethos. Messaging that appeals to the audience’s ego as much more well-versed and experienced in the craft, and appealing to the audience’s assumed credibility, will usually return high-level engagement. The audience loves to share how knowledgeable they are and why they are the best source for knowledge. However, feedback is not necessarily positive if a post tells others directly what to do or is overly opinionated. It is as if people want to give to a genuine seeker, but only want to argue with a direct presenter. This shows a conflict in personal pathos. In general, this provides substantial insight into unspoken rules around rhetorical presentation, which can certainly be considered a significant constraint. It seems to be all in how you present it.
Logical appeal does not go unnoticed, however. Well-crafted messages, employing logical, straightforward, and objective rhetoric, are respected and engaged with. The community uses these opportunities to demonstrate professionalism and helpfulness.
Posts or questions from people starting at ground zero are received well, unless they add to the knowledge base. People have to do a little legwork before coming into the community rhetoric. For example, a question such as “I have researched this one web server to be the best host for my blog. Can anyone offer some advice?” will elicit engagement. Versus, “I think I need a web server for my blog. What is that?” may not do well at all.
There does not appear to be a significant pattern in engagement versus non-engagement based on grammar and punctuation, or on the visual impact of ordered lists, headings, and text blocks with breaks. Instead, topic and appeal appear to be the dominant drivers of engagement. Common topics include SEO practices, monetization, and analytics in blogging.
Participation
Over the course of three weeks, I formulated three posts to engage with the r/Blogging community on Reddit and examine rhetorical patterns within it. My goal was to keep the audience in mind, to structure and word my message professionally, and to attend to timing (kairos). I designed my posts to follow a similar structure to a blog post. I used bold section headings when multiple ideas were to be considered, bullet-point lists, and questions to encourage engagement.
My first two posts were comments on other community members’ posts. The first, Figures 1 and 2, was a sort of “trial run” with the community.
Original Post written by u/dammy341
How do you legally get images for your blog?
My Comment
Creative Commons
I sought to engage the audience by writing a useful post. The recommendation was made bold, and I added an unordered list to give visual impact and create a “how to.” I also added links to the Creative Commons site and to applying a Creative Commons license to your own images. I thought it might drive more responses from people genuinely in need of guidance on image usage for their blogs and increase rhetorical impact.
The second rhetorical participation was more polished and, in my view, of higher content quality. My comment, Figure 4, was in response to a post, Figure 3, by u/X_Xoosp titled “Writing got easier for me when I stopped trying to be perfect.”
Original Post written by u/X_Xoosp
Writing got easier for me when I stopped trying to be perfect
My Comment
A Shitty First Draft!
This time, I tried to reach my audience with a catching headline: “A Shitty First Draft!” How can you skip past that? I attempted to provide an example that no one else had yet offered, which remains the only one as of today, to address the concept of writing and then fixing. Again, I added bullet points for anyone to skim instead of long text that might get skipped. I also added a link to an article that dives deeper into the concept. To finish with an invitation to interact, I left a question about others tackling their blogs in the same way. This comment received one upvote and 28 views.
My final post, Figure 5, had the most engagement. I was finally able to post my own original post after achieving the required level of “comment karma” per the community guidelines.
My Original Post
To the Human-Generated Content and the AI-Generated Content Bloggers in this Community: How Do We Ethically Proceed?
I sought to engage my audience in this post by addressing a compelling ethical issue regarding AI-generated blogging. My title was a question about how the community should proceed ethically. I made a few statements, asked some thought-provoking questions, and concluded with a few more to prompt reflection on what is right or wrong regarding the topic. I used bold for section titles and bullet points for questions to make the large post more digestible and blog-like. I chose a controversial topic in hopes of engaging people in the discussion. This post was viewed 1.8k times, received 11 comments, but did not receive any upvotes. The comments were highly critical of the use of AI in blogging and of the overall ethical concerns of AI use at all levels.
Comments
Click the Reddit link below to explore the thread’s comments.
I learned that people tend to have a lot to say when asked how to do something. However, feedback is not necessarily positive if a post tells others directly what to do or is overly opinionated. It is as if people want to give to a genuine seeker, but only want to argue with a direct presenter. In general, this provides substantial insight into rhetorical presentation. It seems to be all in how you present it.
I also learned that my community is passionate about not using AI-generated blogs. I am certain that some people in the community are bloggers who generate AI content, as I have seen open discussions about it in other posts. I was hoping they would jump in and provide their own valid reasons for using AI-generated content instead of writing their own blog posts. Not one did. This suggests that either they were uncomfortable sharing because it raised an ethical question of use, that they know it is taboo in the community, or that the comments in other posts indicating that people are doing it might be bots.
A pattern I observed was that this community tends to read posts but does not necessarily engage beyond their own comments. Very few comments receive additional engagement. I learned that my community doesn’t necessarily comment on a comment unless they disagree. I found that most people genuinely want to help others in the community with their insights.
Additionally, kairos (timing) matters. Posts and comments receive the most engagement within the first 48 hours, with the first 24 hours being the most critical for counter-rhetorical engagement.
The Reddit Platform
Reddit uses content “flair,” which assigns metadata tags to posts. These metadata tags are used to filter content into categories for user searches, such as Tips/Info, Announcements, and Questions. This shapes how a person immediately perceives the conversation, thereby initiating perspective before receiving the message.
Another feature on Reddit is “comment karma,” a reputation scoring system based on metadata associated with a user’s account. It measures engagement and the quality of participation within communities, which often require higher posting scores. This imposes constraints on the level of rhetorical engagement a user can achieve. Finally, Reddit also uses algorithms to prominently list the best-rated comments and posts, rather than giving precedence to older comments (Cotswold). This method can not only shape the content a user sees but also encourage engagement with a small subset rather than the entire community.
In Conclusion
After a thorough rhetorical analysis of the r/blogging community on Reddit, the community’s demographics, discourse, representative posts, and the extent to which posts have functioned or not, along with the frameworks that govern the community have led me to conclude it is a community for bloggers dedicated to quality rhetoric to connect, share ideas, and inspire each other to help their blogging journey.
Headline Image Credit
Image from Flickr. Created by Eva Blue. Creative Commons License: CC BY 2.0.
Works Cited
Cotswold, London. “Your Trusted Partner for Success Online.” Www.datadial.net, 30 Nov. 2014, www.datadial.net/blog/how-the-reddit-algorithm-works/. Accessed 6 Feb. 2026.
“Definition of RHETORIC.” Merriam-Webster.com, 2019, www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/rhetoric. Accessed 6 Feb. 2026.
Miller, Cara. Writing for Digital Media. Palni Press, 2025, pp. 215–361.
r/Blogging. Reddit, 18 Mar 2008, https://www.reddit.com/r/Blogging/.
u/dammy341. “How do you legally get images for your blog?” Reddit, 16 Jan 2026, https://www.reddit.com/r/Blogging/comments/1qeu29b/how_do_you_legally_get_images_for_your_blog/
u/Fit_Performance8775. Comment on u/dammy341’s post “How do you legally get images for your blog?” Reddit, 19 Jan 2026, https://www.reddit.com/r/Blogging/comments/1qeu29b/comment/o0hchr6/?context=3
u/Fit_Performance8775. Comment on u/X_Xoosp’s post “Writing got easier for me when I stopped trying to be perfect.” Reddit, 26 Jan 2026, https://www.reddit.com/r/Blogging/comments/1qmcdbb/comment/o1vb0v3/?context=3.
u/Fit_Performance8775. “To the Human-Generated Content and the AI-Generated Content Bloggers in this Community: How Do We Ethically Proceed?” Reddit, 2 Feb 2026, https://www.reddit.com/r/Blogging/comments/1qu76ci/to_the_humangenerated_content_and_the_aigenerated/.
u/X_Xoosp. “Writing got easier for me when I stopped trying to be perfect.” Reddit, 24 Jan 2026, https://www.reddit.com/r/Blogging/comments/1qmcdbb/writing_got_easier_for_me_when_i_stopped_trying/.
Leave a Reply